Verdict
• concise 250-300 words (word count excludes quoted material)
• states clearly why Position 1 or Position 2 ‘won’ the trial
• use at least one piece of textual support that was key to the winning argument
Was the following statement PROVED OR DISPROVED in the trial?
“The world and everything in it is unplanned accident, existence is meaningless; the past is irrelevant; nothing matters.”
It seems like position 2 won the trial.Position 2 had a reasonable . Opening statement of the position 1 was unclear. Sometimes the lawyers of the position 1 was going off topic. Secondly the witnesses were not well organized with their lawyers. It seemed like they weren't prepared enough. Sometimes position 1's arguments were sometimes even contradicting each others. Some other witness seemed to shy to talk. and it made them a bad impression. Sometimes, some witnesses stated contradicting ideas. For minority, Some people looked confused and they wern't able to answer. Lastly, position 2 did a better job in reading their passage and examining their roles.
Verdict
• concise 250-300 words (word count excludes quoted material)
• states clearly why Position 1 or Position 2 ‘won’ the trial
• use at least one piece of textual support that was key to the winning argument
Was the following statement PROVED OR DISPROVED in the trial?
“The world and everything in it is unplanned accident, existence is meaningless; the past is irrelevant; nothing matters.”
It seems like position 2 won the trial.Position 2 had a reasonable . Opening statement of the position 1 was unclear. Sometimes the lawyers of the position 1 was going off topic. Secondly the witnesses were not well organized with their lawyers. It seemed like they weren't prepared enough. Sometimes position 1's arguments were sometimes even contradicting each others. Some other witness seemed to shy to talk. and it made them a bad impression. Sometimes, some witnesses stated contradicting ideas. For minority, Some people looked confused and they wern't able to answer. Lastly, position 2 did a better job in reading their passage and examining their roles.